What behaviors constitute retaliation or interference with the Title IX process?

• A. Intimidation, coercion, or harassment aimed at discouraging reporting or participation.
• B. Engaging in constructive dialogue with investigators to resolve concerns.
• C. Normal peer feedback about the investigation.
• D. Routine administrative reminders about deadlines.

Answer: (A)

The key idea is actions that punish or pressure someone to stop reporting or participating in the Title IX process. Intimidation, coercion, or harassment aimed at discouraging reporting or participation fit this because they create fear or leverage to silence someone, which undermines the ability to investigate and address the issue fairly.

Engaging in constructive dialogue with investigators is a normal, appropriate part of addressing concerns and ensuring clarity, not retaliation. Normal peer feedback about the investigation is typical communication and not designed to deter participation. Routine administrative reminders about deadlines are standard process steps and not meant to intimidate or interfere.