Which scenario is an exception to Title IX prohibitions?

• A. Higher math can be available only to girls.
• B. Boys and girls must have separate dining facilities.
• C. Boys and girls can be separated for human sexuality classes.
• D. Boys and girls must be separated in non-contact sports.

Answer: (C)

The key idea is that Title IX bans discrimination based on sex in education programs that receive federal funds, but it does allow limited sex-based distinctions when they serve an legitimate educational purpose and don’t reduce overall access to opportunities. Separating boys and girls for human sexuality classes fits that exception because it addresses privacy and comfort concerns in a sensitive subject, which can help students participate fully and learn the same material without being prevented from enrolling. The separation should still provide equal access to the curriculum and the same learning outcomes, just in a setting that respects privacy needs.

Why the other scenarios aren’t the exception: offering higher math only to one gender would deny students access to an educational opportunity based on sex, which Title IX prohibits. Separating dining facilities by sex isn’t tied to delivering an education program or course, and would typically constitute unequal treatment in a school’s services. Separating in non-contact sports runs against providing equal athletic opportunities and isn’t an allowed excuse under Title IX just for privacy or comfort, since the goal of athletics is equal participation rather than restricted access.